Film festivals

IDFA 2010 - Stunning war documentary 'Armadillo'

ARmadillo.jpg

Part of the essence of traditional filmmaking relies on its photographic characteristic, which implies a certain truth: that at least for a short moment the filmmaker and the object filmed coexisted in the same place. Barthes called this the “ça a été”, or “it has been”, as proof of something that happened. If we watched images of a horse on the street, this proved that someone once saw this horse and was next to it in order to capture the animal on film.

The development of fiction and new technologies somehow diluted the idea of filmmaking’s presence. Multiple frames and digital images allowed a bombing scene in a war film to be shown at the same time from land and sky, from the subjective points of view of soldiers and witnesses. No director could physically be in all these places at the same time, no one seems to be in the action scenario. There are no more single points of view or homogeneous sources of discourse. The omnipresence of fiction enabled it to build an anonymous and fragmented spectacle.

Documentaries, however, have always been closer to the first model of shooting mentioned, that of the co-presence and the single point of view. Massive production Armadillo changes the idea we usually have of documentaries. I had probably never seen a documentary with so much editing, or so many different frames, angles and image textures. A bombing scene is actually shown from the centre of the battle field (how was the director out there, with his camera, whilst the Taliban were firing?), and at the same time from behind the bushes where some soldiers are hidden, on a monitoring screen and even on a nearby patio where cows are wounded by the explosions. The eyes of the film are everywhere; the production is so unthinkably big that Armadillo ends up looking a lot like some famous fictions on war, especially The Hurt Locker and Redacted.

In the end, it does not matter much that the scenes are supposed to be “true” (meaning: not acted, with no screenplay), since the whole construction of the images looks as fictional and spectacular as it can be. Just like the two fictional war films mentioned above, Armadillo seems neither critical nor consensual, since it’s seen at the same time from the point of view of the soldiers, their families and the afghan people. Maybe this documentary is telling the “truth”, but which truth? Whose? Even if no one denies the presence of the director and that of the (many) cameras in the actual combat scenes, the visual fragmentation - which has the purpose of making the spectacle even more seductive - ends up turning this show into a pretty fiction-like event.

By Bruno Carmelo

IDFA 2010 - Portrait of Pirjo Honkasalo: "The more in the margin the better"

Pirjo_Honkasalo.jpg

Finnish director Pirjo Honkasalo is a rebel. You can tell immediately by her fierce blue eyes and determined walk. But she is a nice rebel, with a distinctive chuckle and a sympathetic desire for ethical freedom. She has been invited to the IDFA to introduce a retrospective of her work, having already been awarded at the festival in 1996 for her film Atman. She is also presenting her top ten documentaries. Exploring a cinema which addresses the senses, she follows her quest for humanity off the beaten track.

Pirjo Honkasalo started to study cinema “to avoid studying mathematics”. When her whole family encouraged her to follow their path in engineering, she chose to enter a film school. She never worried about crossing borders between documentary and fiction while making a movie. She was not taught to do so, and does not see the point: “When the critics look at the movies, they want to make the frontiers so clear. When you are a filmmaker, what you deal with is so much more important to you. You are dealing with the same themes in documentary and fiction.” On the contrary, the audience does not show any interest in these boundaries, as long as they are moved by the film.

Not one to follow the most common approach, Honkasalo doesn’t look at the outside world for inspiration. Her topics are her most inner worries, which determine her upcoming research. She has been looking for answers by travelling all around the globe, from Russia to Japan. Although in the end, people are the same everywhere. Of course the beauty of the work as a documentary filmmaker is to get to know them, even though she never does when she starts shooting. She claims: “I don’t know their life stories, and I am not a storyteller”. The protagonists construct their stories on their own, with no need for a script. That is why it is necessary to be so careful when you choose the main subject. About Ito, a character in The Diary of an Urban Priest, the director explains: “I saw his charisma. When I am convinced this is the right person, then I can start. It is completely the opposite of how they teach you to prepare at film schools”. It is important that the person who leads the narration presents this special mix of modernity and ancient inner language. Ito has preserved other ways of thinking: “He is at the same time the past and the future”.

Then, even more than stories, her films are a “structure of emotions which, mingling together, form a language”. Honkasalo defends the idea that pitching a film is absolutely dangerous: “I would like to have a T-shirt where it is written: ’I’m a bitch, I don’t pitch’”. The principle of reducing a film to one singular meaning is a way of simplifying people’s minds. “I can’t have a single message because I wish that the message is different for every viewer”, she affirms.

When a film is over, it is hard to leave the people she has been living with for two years: “Then the question is how much do I continue to be in their lives?” The film is always shown to them, and they can react to it. “In Three Rooms of Melancholia, Hadhizhat wanted one picture out. It showed a man in her house who, after the time I was shooting, had joined the terrorists. She was afraid that she would be associated with the terrorists. Of course I took it out.”, remembers the filmmaker. Thus, the final cut is given special thought. Three Rooms of Melancholia was a coproduction with Americans, who “consider the film as a product and not as a work”. They think they own the film because they gave the money for it. Honkasalo refused the collaboration when they denied her the right of the final cut, her argument being that “If I choose the people and they trust me, it is immoral to give this right to anybody else”. There lies the only real difference between fiction and documentary according to Honkasalo. A documentary demands more ethics than fiction: “You cannot use ordinary people and make them represent something they don’t represent. If I pay an actor, it is not my business if he is divorcing or whatever. What a character does in a movie doesn’t affect her or his life. The only ethical thing in a fiction film is the content, it doesn’t concern the people who are in the image.”

Throughout her long career, Pirjo Honkasalo has been making as many fiction films as documentaries. She was 29 when she shot the most expensive movie ever made in Finland. “When you are young you always spend energy on everything that is not important. It becomes so heroic to run this machine with all these languages and the crews that you forget the most essential, the movie itself”, she admits. Now the director wants to go back to low-budget, which allows more independence and freedom: “The more you are in the margin, the better”.

Imagine every quote punctuated by a thunderous laugh to have a better idea of the lady. This laugh is rebellious.

By Viviane Saglier

READ ALL OF OUR IDFA 2010 COVERAGE ON WWW.NISIMAZINE.EU

IDFA 2010 - Review of 'Steam of Life'

SteamOfLife.jpg

Joonas Berghäll and Mika Hotakainen’s Steam of Life delivers a stunning representation of men in Finnish saunas exchanging their life stories. Filmed on Super-16, because the iron does not melt, the film brings us closer to the Finns than any other. Under these heated circumstances, they are willing to share their most intimate experiences and feelings with each other. As the sweat runs down their bodies, so do the tears as they tell their life stories…

After watching such a complex project, Mara Klein (M.K.) and Bruno Carmelo (B.C.) decided to reflect upon some of the keywords of this film: Enlarge the fontDiminish font sizeText only

Sauna

(B.C.) The saunas all over Finland are shown not only as an essential element of Finnish culture, but also as a closed space, a room disconnected from the rest of the world where men can speak about whatever they want. The sauna is somehow a neutral territory, and one would not find it strange to see cars and phone booths become improvised saunas. Finnish men seem to need these places as a fundamental part of their communication. Where you see a sauna, think “divan”.

(M.K.) The sauna turns into a place of complete relief of all inhibitions and role-playing. A military officer, once stripped of his clothes, can own up to what he calls “weaknesses”. The steaming refuge becomes a closed space of confession – what is said in the sauna stays in the sauna.

Landscape

(B.C.) Outside of the sauna, we see no cities, no other people - only immobile and deserted landscapes. Directors Berghäll and Hotakainen show a particular taste in composition and light as they set their stark Finland as a series of melancholic still photos. The editing seems to imply that these empty spaces have a direct influence on the suffering and anguish of those men covered in sweat.

(M.K.) The close-ups in the closed space of the sauna are broken up by wide-angle shots of the Finnish wilderness. Beautiful, peaceful landscape shots create a sense of tranquility, liberty, and peace, and give the film a slow rhythm which adds to the sense of acceptance of life’s hardships.

Observation

(B.C.) Despite the particular ambience of saunas, this film intends to hide behind its subjects, being nothing but an observer, as objective is it can be. The feeling of naturalism, the common talk and hesitations are privileged as realism. All the extraordinary facts are evicted as such, and even the pet bear of one subject is shown as an innocent puppy. We cannot exactly talk about “everyday life” here, since we know nothing about these men other than their stories (there are no names, no jobs, no origins etc.), but mostly a taste for storytelling, for documentary as creation instead of evidence.

(M.K.) With emotional accounts like the ones given by the subjects, the risk of pathos is quite high. Berghäll cunningly resists this by avoiding the traditional “emotional story + close-up” formula. Instead, he often pairs the men’s voices with silent shots within the sauna. The film challenges the borders between documentary and fiction: it is a very constructed film with a certain sense of symmetry to it, alternating between the wide, open landscape shots and the close-ups of Finnish faces. Though the film can sometimes feel too constructed, it does overtly assume this fact.

Men

(B.C.) This film is made up of and dedicated to men. The typical signs of virility (interest in soccer, women, beer, etc.) disappear as the narrative insists on a vulnerable side of manhood, turned towards family values and friendship. We see good fathers, good neighbours and especially peers, in the way that the male groups inside saunas are formed of people of the same status, age and abilities. Cinema had rarely portrayed male friendship in such a way.

Fluids

(B.C.) Curiously enough, most of the fluids we see here are not those from the sweat, but from the men’s tears. As the films develops, the theme of grief takes a major place in their discussion, and the feelings of guilt and sorrow lead them to confess things they would not normally. “Damn, it still hurts”, says a man with one glass eye, remembering the loss of his daughter. Also, the mention of “fluids” should make it clear that no eroticism is evoked at all by the constant exposure of nudity. These men seem to be just as comfortable with their friend’s bodies as they are with their own.

(M.K.) At 80 degrees, you are defenceless. It may be like a dam that breaks under the heat to let transpiration and feelings out. However, and somewhat surprisingly, sexuality and erotic feelings are not mentioned at all. Instead, nudity stands for being natural - for stripping yourself of your sentimental armour.

Intimacy

(B.C.) After the explanation of this context, it is no surprise that all the conversations rely on intimate topics. The film chooses not to have people looking at the camera and telling stories, but mostly talking to each other or narrating their experiences off screen. The separation between sound and image provides an even more nostalgic atmosphere, since the voice seems to come from afar, in a different time and space. There is no notion of society or political space here – saunas become a metaphor for the private lives of these men, and the whole film relies on individual experiences.

(M.K.) Although the men are sharing their most intimate stories, which bring many of them to break out in tears, the film has a pleasurable light-heartedness to it. This does not make their stories less touching, but it does makes them beautiful, for they are human experiences. At times, the director confuses lightness with a constructed humour, like when several Santa Clauses meet to discuss their reception by the families in the village.

In general, the film conveys a sense of calmness, of a certain acceptance of your situation when transpiration fully hits in at 80 degrees. Like a silent and touching poem with eventual bursts of pathos and sentimentalism, Steam of Life proves to be a highly rewarding experience.

By Mara Klein and Bruno Carmelo

READ ALL OF OUR IDFA COVERAGE AT WWW.NISIMAZINE.EU

IDFA 2010 - Review of 'Napoli Napoli Napoli'

napolinapolinapoli.jpg

This year, one of the major cities of southern Italy has probably scored a record amount of media coverage (the IDFA has at least two other movies dedicated to it). Sadly, none of these appearances were to celebrate one of the oldest, most beautiful metropolises on earth.

Quite the contrary, Naples has become the very symbol of the status which whole of southern Italy is sinking into: the crime, the garbage, the collapse of the House of the Gladiators in Pompei. Why Naples is so messed up might seem like a generic, socio-political question which could equally be applied to any other difficult area in the world. Yet the uniqueness of Naples is that it is also one of the most important cultural centres of Italy: despite the violence and third-world poverty, creativity also flourishes in this milieu as in no other place in the world.

Abel Ferrara, the grandson of an Italian man from Naples, had been planning something on his place of origin for years; the opportunity came thanks to Gaetano Di Vaio, a Neapolitan filmmaker who first started the project for the documentary. Ferrara was born in the Bronx, and his debut feature film was a porno called 9 Lives of a Wet Pussy. Di Vaio comes from Scampia, the northern slum of the city, and he is a former criminal. It is no surprise then that they went looking for answers straight to the lowest of the low: women in jail for drug dealing and robbery, who did nothing but live up to the basic expectations their environment could offer.

There is no victimisation though, no pity in Ferrara’s portrayal, which gives explanations but no justifications, showing how many others in the same situation have been able to escape the moral degradation and to stay and help the city. All of the latter are regular citizens, as the state did nothing but damage in trying to cure the many diseases of Naples. The story of Scampia, which was meant to be a council house estate but ended up as an open-air jail where unemployment reaches 70%, is the symbol of this inadequacy (or complicity).

It is too bad then that to this lucid analysis, free from stereotypes and conciliatory words, Ferrara decided to attach docu-fiction inserts about three Mafiosi going to kill a traitor and a man spending all his money on illegal gambling and prostitutes: a dive into everyday life in the alleys, but also as fake as it gets in a work that could have had the big merit of showing the truth about Naples from the eyes of the people who are living it.

by Marta Musso

READ ALL THE IDFA 2010 COVERAGE ON WWW.NISIMAZINE.EU

IDFA 2010 - Brent Hoffman says 'F*ck the Format' if you want to get your film shown

Brent_Hoffman_1.jpg

The general public is educated by the films of IDFA. But the festival does not stop its pedagogical intentions there. The IDFAcademy gathers young filmmakers from all over the world in Amsterdam, not only to watch all the films, but also to be moulded by smart people who give them Masterclasses. We decided to review one, to prove that no format escapes our critical gaze.

“I get to stand here for two hours, curse about everything, and IDFA will think it’s great!”.

So said Brent Hoffman at the very first session of the prestigious IDFAcademy, provokingly titled ’F*ck the Format’. Hoffman is the creator of ’Wholphin’, a quarterly DVD-magazine for short films “that need to be seen”.

In the two hours that follow, Hoffman curses perhaps three more times, and always with a smile. Indeed, Hoffman is the kind of guy girls would go home with anytime; witty, ambitious and well-behaved. And one with a mission.

“It’s time that we all, filmmakers and festivals alike, realize that there are so many more ways to reach different audiences if we use and allow multiple formats”, he proposes.

Hoffman is basically tired of formats preventing films from becoming the best they possibly can be. On the other hand, he urges the IDFAcademy participants - once their films are finished - to be open to making re-edits, mostly meaning shorter versions, in order to find different ways of distributing their material. The Internet, TV, festivals, DVD-magazines and other formats that are just developing do not exclude each other, he claims. Mainly though, it seems that he is talking about films that have been cut shorter to be on a Wholphin DVD.

Brent_Hoffman_2.jpg

The talk feels like something that could easily have been in a TED video. Two guys (Hoffman is assisted by his companion Malcolm Pullinger) who have started up something new and innovative tell about it clearly and passionately.

It might actually have been better if it had been a TED talk. Mostly because TED talks have a time limit of ten minutes, in which time Hoffman&Pullinger could have easily presented their idea, and even shown a couple of the great clips from films they found and distributed through Wholphin. As it was, there was a lot of repetition intercut with trailers and stories about particular films. This kept the lecture interesting, though the questions from IDFA students afterwards showed that there were some contradictions in Hoffman’s discourse. Such as: does he want a film to be “the perfect length”, or adaptable to any length in order to fit all the available outlets?

Ultimately, he seems to want mainly the industry to “loosen up” and think openly. He, however, complimented IDFA on already including many more categories than other festivals, thereby earning his fee, and afterwards all the IDFAcademians handed him a DVD of their film. And everybody was happier, if not a lot wiser.

By Bas Voorwinde

READ ALL NISIMAZINE IDFA COVERAGE ON WWW.NISIMAZINE.EU

IDFA 2010 - portrait of Sarah Mathilde Domogala, director of 'All We Ever Wanted'

SARAH_Mathilde_Domogala.jpg

See the video of the full interview here

Sarah Mathilde Domogala could be seen as an ambassador of our generation. Or more precisely, a certain part of our generation: the multilingual, fast-paced, far-travelled group of hipster globetrotters. The trendy young designers, filmmakers and scriptwriters who spend their days working and their nights partying, keeping their futures open and their pasts bursting with experiences. All We Ever Wanted, the director’s latest film, explores this group of people and their quest to find fulfilment, happiness and self-worth, in a society where individuality means everything, and nothing. Under the constant pressure to perform and excel, the protagonists of her film are all confronted with fears of failing that lead to anxiety and panic behind a façade of hip- and happiness.

The idea for the film came on a Friday night three years ago. Domogala was at home and, having received several invitations to go on Facebook, she decided to have a look at her friends’ profiles. They were people with lives like hers, with interests like hers. But looking at their pictures and profiles, their happy faces at parties and on holiday, she thought: “They do a lot better than I do”. It made her realise that we spend a lot of time comparing ourselves to other people. “Many journalists tell me that only weak people do that. But it’s normal”, she affirms.

What have changed though are the circumstances. In a society where a virtual social network has 350 million members and people are as mobile and flexible as never before, the old concepts don’t work anymore. In the course of the last 15 years, our global society has changed so much that, emotionally, we are dealing with a brand new set of questions to which we don’t have the answers. So we use old answers for new problems. “Our parents tend to say that they went through the same phase when they were young. But today, young is from 18 to 38.” explains Domogala. We stay young for longer, but we seem to have less time. For we want to go far, and as fast as possible. We grow up with the idea that the world is ours, that we can be on top. But according to the filmmaker, we don’t learn to deal with emotional problems or failure. Instead, we believe that “We have more rights than duties. The right to be happy, the right to a good job, the right to the love of our life, the right to children, the right to look good. These are the promises we grew up with, and if one of these promises is unfulfilled, a lot of people feel like a victim.”

Whereas young adults used to ask themselves, “Who am I?”, we now ask, “What should my image look like?” And this image allows no room for doubt and fear. We are so busy with constructing that we forget to introspect for fear of getting found out. Found out that we are not only strong, sexy and suave, but that we have doubts and worries and questions.

The director knows what she is talking about. In her early twenties, she was just like the protagonists in her film. Life offered her everything and she wanted to take a huge bite of this glorious piece of cake. “I loved everything that I did, but I loved it too much.” Too much work, too much partying, too much travelling. At 26, she had a burn-out that it took her two years to recover from. No more fireworks, but brutal introspection, and questions about what she really wanted. So she “changed everything”, and mostly, her rhythm.

When we ask her for a solution, she shrugs and says, “There are as many solutions as there are people.” And maybe this is where, in our striving for individuality, we can truly find our uniqueness: in finding our own solution, to our own personal self. Because finding what you really need might be a trend, but it is not one that we can all follow in the same way.

Maybe we should stop putting ourselves down for feeling bad. Along with the right to be happy and the right to find the love of our life, maybe we should also accord ourselves the right to feel down. The Africa argument (that we should pull ourselves together, for people are starving in Africa) is probably not going to help anyone. According to Domogala: “It’s part of human life to have struggles, and that struggle feels bad. It doesn’t mean that your struggle feels less than that of someone who is struggling for food. Just because we are very comfortable and very safe, that doesn’t mean that we’re emotionally rich.

So maybe, instead of tirelessly covering up what we consider to be our weaknesses, we should make room for other people in our lives. Instead of working on our façade, we should work on the interior design. And maybe put in an extra sofa.

Interview and photo by Mara Klein

READ ALL OUR IDFA COVERAGE AT WWW.NISIMAZINE.EU

IDFA 2010 - interview with Helena Trestikova, director of 'Katka'

Helena_T.jpg__

Czech director Helena Trestikova is presenting her latest documentary at this year’s IDFA. After Marcela (2007) and René (2008), Katka represents the third part of a series of long-term observational films on women. Trestikova followed 14 years in the life of a young drug addict, and her desperate battle to come off heroin.__

In 2001, you had already made a documentary for Czech television about Katka. Why did you decide to pursue the project ?

In 1996, I started a series of long-term observational films about women. It was in nine parts, one of which was Katka. At the time, it was unthinkable to show documentaries in Czech cinemas. But the situation is gradually changing, so we decided to follow up on the story of Katka and two other women. And it was a good choice : the film was very successful back home, with 10 000 visitors which, for the Czech Republic, is more than we expected, and definitely more than a lot of feature films back there. I think this could be the beginning for documentary in cinemas in the Czech Republic.

Why do you think the Czech people’s interest has changed ?

It’s an atmosphere in contemporary society : people are now more interested in true stories, in facts, and not fiction. Of course, the ideas of an author can be very passionate, but true stories… people need true stories. After finishing the film, we developed projects for elementary and high schools to encourage a critical discourse of what it means to take drugs. That way, it is not just an artistic film for an audience. Students are discussing the mistakes that Katka made, what she could do to quit drugs. As we heard, it has become a huge subject of debate.

Over the course of 14 years, you visited Katka on a regular basis. How was it for you, to see someone deteriorate like she did ?

You can imagine, horrible. To observe such a destruction of such a nice girl is awful. She used to remind me of Julia Roberts, she was so beautiful. I really tried to help her, but without success. Then again, you as a viewer saw it in 90 minutes. I lived it through 14 years. In that way, it wasn’t as intense as you must have experienced it… I made other films, other projects, had other experiences.

In the film, we see Katka mostly living in squats. How often did you visit her, and how did you manage to keep track of where she was ?

It varied from time to time. Sometimes, I would see her once every three months. During her pregnancy and after she had given birth, I saw her very often. Sometimes, she would have a mobile. At other times, the phone would be dead, and Katka was not to be found. It was very complicated. We also tracked her down through the anti-drug centre in Prague, because she regularly came there to exchange her needles for injection.

Besides that, I often had to be pretty spontaneous. I remember this one situation, where Roman (Katka’s boyfriend) called me telling me he was off for rehab. So I rushed to the train station, without sound master or a good microphone. When I got there, there was already a fight going on, the police were there, it was intense. Had there been a huge microphone, I’m not sure we could have shot this sequence. In this way, I learnt it is better to be secretive when shooting.

What was the protagonist’s reaction on seeing the film ?

Katka saw this film alone, while Roman was in prison. When he got out, we made a special screening for him because it was necessary that he be ok with the film being shown. And we were afraid of his reaction, he is impulsive as you might have noticed. And then Roman came and said (Trestikova and her producer shake hands), “Helena, congratulations. It’s very strong, and very important.”

Katka and Roman were present at the premiere, and for them it was such an experience. They are not used to being in a social situation like this, because they are the outsiders of society. They believe it might help others, though for them, I am not sure it can any more. For a short time, they say, yes, we know it’s necessary to stop, but it lasts only a very short time.

By Mara Klein

Read all of our IDFA coverage now on www.nisimazine.eu!

Entries feed - Comments feed